Wednesday, March 11, 2020
ON24 Webinar
U.S. Customs has the power to seize and detain imported goods for violating trademark or copyright, but not patents. The Counterfeit Goods Seizure Act of 2019, introduced in December 2019, would add U.S. design patents to the types of intellectual property that Customs can enforce. This webinar will briefly discuss the enforcement mechanisms already available for U.S. design patents, how enforcement may work with U.S. Customs if the Act becomes law, and the pros and cons to these different enforcement mechanisms.
Event Details
Wednesday, March 11, 2020-
Wednesday, March 11, 2020
ON24 Webinar
1:00-2:00 p.m. Webinar
Participants may log in as early as 12:45 p.m. ET.
CLE Credit
CLE credit approval is pending. Please answer poll question(s) during program to satisfy attendance verification. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP will apply for CLE credit when eligible in California, Colorado, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Washington. For states not listed, a Certificate of Attendance which lawyers may use to self-apply for credit will be provided.
Contact
Alaina Maggio
Business Development Manager
Speakers
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
